Peter Makk vs Quinn Vandecasteele Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How effective are Vandecasteele and Makk when it comes to second serve performance? Vandecasteele secures 44.89% of points on their second serve, whereas Makk has shown no success at 0%.
• In terms of returning, Vandecasteele has an edge, claiming 47.09% of opponents' second serve points and 31.34% on first serve returns, while Makk has 0% in both areas.
• How do both players fare under pressure? Vandecasteele has managed to save 59.86% of breakpoints, a significant advantage compared to Makk, who has saved none.
• Looking at overall performance, Vandecasteele has a 44.44% win rate over the past year, facing more matches, while Makk has a higher win percentage at 75%, albeit within fewer matches.
• Both players seem to thrive on hard courts, with Vandecasteele having a 58% win rate and Makk a more impressive 75% win rate on this surface.
• In lower-tier events, Vandecasteele has been more active, winning 51.61% of matches, while Makk boasts a higher success rate at 75% but in fewer appearances.
• When it comes to opponents' quality, Vandecasteele tends to play against significantly more experienced players, averaging an opponent rank of 412.57, whereas Makk competes mostly against unranked players.
• How do they perform in deciding sets? Vandecasteele has a 29% success rate, while Makk has a perfect 100% record, making them formidable in crucial moments.
• Vandecasteele has shown an ability to convert breakpoints at 35.85%, whereas Makk hasn't converted any.

Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis match, Vandecasteele and Makk present contrasting strengths and challenges. Vandecasteele demonstrates strong performance under pressure, with the ability to save breakpoints effectively and convert opportunities, hinting at resilience during critical junctures of the match.

Makk, while less tested in volume, brings an impressive win record and decisive-set prowess, highlighting their potential to perform when it truly matters. Despite playing fewer matches, Makk's ability to maintain a 100% win rate in deciding sets adds a competitive edge.

Considering Vandecasteele's broader experience against more challenging opponents, coupled with a better track record of converting scoring opportunities, they appear to have a slight advantage. If Vandecasteele can capitalize on Makk's deficiencies in converting breakpoints, they are likely to prevail.

Given these comparative insights, Vandecasteele is the probable victor in this forthcoming contest.